Sorry for the delay between updates -- I think we've finally hit the calm before the storm. While we've been busy with work and such, the girl has just been swimming along in there rather uneventfully at the moment. She kicks constantly, which I LOVE, and we both just get more excited to meet her everyday.
We did have one thought-provoking baby moment this week, watching an amazing new documentary called "The Business of Being Born." It was created and moderated by talk show host Ricki Lake, after she had a not-so-good hospital birth experience with her first child and then a really good home birth experience with her second child. It basically explored why we're one of the only countries (developed and underdeveloped) that relies so heavily on hospital births with OBs and has less midwife-assisted home and birthing center births. Yet, we have the highest infant and maternal mortality rate of any developed country, and have the highest c-section and induced labor rates of any developed country.
The movie took a lot of leaps, basically concluding that the reasons for the high rates of c-sections and inductions had to do with not wanting women in the hospital too long so the hospitals could turn over beds frequently and make money. I don't entirely agree with this reasoning, especially stated so bluntly as the ONLY reason we have such high rates of these interventions, but I also don't believe its an entirely far-fetched or inaccurate assessment of PART of the reason births in our country occur the way they do.
The most amazing part for me and Jay (aside from being able to watch three amazing home births and an emergency c-section totally unedited) was hearing the medical explanations for what happens to the body during a labor that has an early intervention like pitocin. This is a common scenario these days: Say I start having contractions that are 1 minute in length/3 minutes apart and am told to head to the hospital, only to find I am 2 cm dilated. I could stay this way for HOURS, if not days, with no harm to the baby (particularly if my water hasn't broken, which it statistically most often doesn't, despite every woman's fear and/or knowledge of women who's water broke with a gush in line at the supermarket). Because of a high risk of bacterial infection (which I believe is possible, living the repercussions first-hand of a bacterial infection gone awry last year), after your water breaks, babies must be born within 12 hours. But if it hasn't (which again it is most likely not to), I could labor for a long while at the hospital. But, the movie concludes, the prevailing belief is if the baby could be born sooner rather than later, wouldn't it be more ideal for everyone? The hospitals prey on the idea that you're already at the hospital and are anxious to meet your baby, and they conclude almost 100% of the time that a long labor can cause the baby to be in distress (which may or may not be entirely true, depending on your circumstances). So you say, sure, let's try some pitocin to speed things up. Next thing you know you've shot up to 5 cm dilated in a half-hour and are in extreme pain, and so they give you an epidural, which makes you feel great but by nature slows down your contractions. However, they still want that baby out, even if you feel like you could handle contractions for a few more hours, so they up the pitocin even more to get you fully dilated as soon as possible. Now, you can feel the contractions even stronger despite the epidural, which they promptly turn up so you can feel less and hopefully be more rested for pushing. But then the contractions slow again, and the cycle begins all over. Eventually, you're having difficulty pushing because you're numbed to even the pressure of the contractions, and since you're already prepped with the anesthesia, they wheel you off to have a c-section because at this point it IS imperative that they get the baby out.
While every birth experience is different, and this was a fairly biased documentary advocating for home births and against hospital births, the above scenario made a lot of sense to me, and is one we'd like to avoid. So, I'm going to do a bit more research, and while I certainly remain totally open to taking whatever course of action my particular labor demands, I'd like to avoid the early interventions like pitocin if they are not medically necessary. I'm still up for an epidural, but I'd like to try to see how things progress naturally before I make any decisions.
All of this may be a moot point, however, because at this point I have a strong suspicion that she is breech, which would require a c-section if she doesn't turn in the next 10 weeks. It's entirely possible that she will, but all movement at this point is centered very low, barely higher than the top of my pubic bone. From what I've read and seen (and clearly what I feel, which is an even strong indicator), most movement felt is kicks, not punches, which would mean those are her feet down there. I'm going to ask the doctor on July 1 when we go in, and I know there are ways to manipulate her in the uterus that can help her flip around, but I think it is helpful at this point to keep an open mind about c-sections.
All of this is just interesting food for thought, but I've never been one to believe in absolutes and I don't think at the end of the day I'm going to feel super strongly about much other than having a healthy baby (since that's all I feel super strongly about now). But it was interesting to watch the presentation of beliefs I'd never really given much thought to unfold in front of me and actually make a bit of sense. I guess this is the true definition of "learning."
So while we ponder this some more, I'll leave you with a fairly recent belly pic (from Thursday):

All for now!